Also detected, no federal limit: PFPeA, PFHxA, PFBA, PFHpA, 6:2 FTS, PFBS, PFHpS.
Is there PFAS in Duxbury Water Department water?
Yes. EPA's final UCMR 5 results show Duxbury Water Department averaged 34.7 ppt of PFOS at its worst sampling point, 8.7 times the EPA limit of 4 ppt.
Duxbury Water Department is a public water system drawing on groundwater, based in Duxbury, Massachusetts, serving about 16,387 people. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 16 times across 7 sampling points between Jul 2024 and May 2025.
Every PFAS detected
| PFAS | Detected | Highest | Worst point avg | EPA limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFPeA Perfluoropentanoic acid |
2 of 16 | 46.6 ppt | 43.5 ppt | none |
| PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid |
2 of 16 | 35.0 ppt | 34.7 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFHxS Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid |
2 of 16 | 31.0 ppt | 29.2 ppt | 10 ppt |
| PFHxA Perfluorohexanoic acid |
2 of 16 | 30.7 ppt | 29.5 ppt | none |
| PFBA Perfluorobutanoic acid |
2 of 16 | 12.9 ppt | 11.4 ppt | none |
| PFHpA Perfluoroheptanoic acid |
2 of 16 | 10.6 ppt | 9.9 ppt | none |
| PFOA Perfluorooctanoic acid |
3 of 16 | 7.5 ppt | 6.3 ppt | 4 ppt |
| 6:2 FTS 6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonic acid |
1 of 16 | 5.7 ppt | 2.9 ppt | none |
| PFBS Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid |
2 of 16 | 3.5 ppt | 3.5 ppt | none |
| PFHpS Perfluoroheptanesulfonic acid |
2 of 16 | 3.3 ppt | 3.2 ppt | none |
Not detected: 4:2 FTS, PFTrDA, NEtFOSAA, NMeFOSAA, PFMPA, PFMBA, PFEESA, NFDHA, PFPeS, ADONA, PFTA, 8:2 FTS, PFNA, PFDA, PFDoA, PFUnA, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, 9Cl-PF3ONS, HFPO-DA.
Lithium, tested in the same program: not detected.
What the EPA limits mean here
In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.
Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.
What you can do at home
Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.
Other systems in Massachusetts
- North Reading Water Dept. 3 PFAS detected
- East Longmeadow Dpw Water Dept none detected
- Bellingham Dpw Water Sewer Div. 3 PFAS detected
- Easthampton Water Dept none detected
- Sharon Water Dept above an EPA limit
- Longmeadow Water Dept none detected
All 263 tested systems in Massachusetts
ZIP codes served
02332
As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.
Cite this page
Well & Tap. "PFAS in Duxbury Water Department water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID MA4082000. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/massachusetts/duxbury-water-department/
About this data
Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID MA4082000). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.