Also detected, no federal limit: PFBS, PFPeA, PFBA, PFHxA, PFHpA.
Is there PFAS in Dartmouth Water Division water?
Yes. EPA's final UCMR 5 results show Dartmouth Water Division averaged 25.3 ppt of PFOS at its worst sampling point, 6.3 times the EPA limit of 4 ppt.
Dartmouth Water Division is a public water system drawing on surface water, based in Dartmouth, Massachusetts, serving about 24,696 people, including North Dartmouth, South Dartmouth. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 10 times across 4 sampling points between Mar 2024 and Dec 2024.
Every PFAS detected
| PFAS | Detected | Highest | Worst point avg | EPA limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid |
1 of 10 | 50.6 ppt | 25.3 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFBS Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid |
2 of 10 | 20.7 ppt | 14.6 ppt | none |
| PFPeA Perfluoropentanoic acid |
1 of 10 | 11.8 ppt | 5.9 ppt | none |
| PFBA Perfluorobutanoic acid |
1 of 10 | 9.4 ppt | 4.7 ppt | none |
| PFHxA Perfluorohexanoic acid |
1 of 10 | 7.6 ppt | 3.8 ppt | none |
| PFOA Perfluorooctanoic acid |
1 of 10 | 4.2 ppt | 2.1 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFHpA Perfluoroheptanoic acid |
1 of 10 | 3.0 ppt | 1.5 ppt | none |
Not detected: 8:2 FTS, PFDoA, PFNA, PFHxS, NMeFOSAA, NEtFOSAA, PFTrDA, PFTA, PFHpS, PFDA, NFDHA, 4:2 FTS, 6:2 FTS, PFMBA, PFUnA, PFMPA, PFEESA, ADONA, PFPeS, 9Cl-PF3ONS, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, HFPO-DA.
Lithium, tested in the same program: not detected.
What the EPA limits mean here
In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.
Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.
What you can do at home
Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.
Other systems in Massachusetts
- Easton Water Div above an EPA limit
- Walpole Water Dept above an EPA limit
- Oak Bluffs Water District 2 PFAS detected
- Dracut Water Supply District above an EPA limit
- Burlington Water Dept 1 PFAS detected
- Stoneham Water Dept (mwra Supply) none detected
All 263 tested systems in Massachusetts
ZIP codes served
02747 02748
As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.
Cite this page
Well & Tap. "PFAS in Dartmouth Water Division water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID MA4072000. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/massachusetts/dartmouth-water-division/
About this data
Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID MA4072000). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.