Also detected, no federal limit: PFPeA, PFHxA, PFBS.
Is there PFAS in Centerville Osterville Marstons Mills WD water?
Yes. EPA's final UCMR 5 results show Centerville Osterville Marstons Mills WD averaged 4.8 ppt of PFOA at its worst sampling point, 1.2 times the EPA limit of 4 ppt.
Centerville Osterville Marstons Mills WD is a public water system drawing on groundwater, based in Osterville, Massachusetts, serving about 50,000 people, including Centerville, Marstons Mills, Osterville. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 30 times across 15 sampling points between Feb 2025 and Oct 2025.
Every PFAS detected
| PFAS | Detected | Highest | Worst point avg | EPA limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFPeA Perfluoropentanoic acid |
7 of 30 | 7.5 ppt | 5.9 ppt | none |
| PFHxA Perfluorohexanoic acid |
7 of 30 | 6.9 ppt | 6.1 ppt | none |
| PFOA Perfluorooctanoic acid |
3 of 30 | 4.9 ppt | 4.8 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFBS Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid |
3 of 30 | 4.0 ppt | 2.0 ppt | none |
| PFHxS Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid |
2 of 30 | 3.1 ppt | 1.6 ppt | 10 ppt |
Not detected: 9Cl-PF3ONS, PFDA, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, PFUnA, PFDoA, PFOS, PFNA, PFHpA, PFBA, HFPO-DA, NEtFOSAA, ADONA, NMeFOSAA, PFTrDA, PFTA, PFHpS, PFPeS, NFDHA, PFEESA, PFMBA, 6:2 FTS, 8:2 FTS, PFMPA, 4:2 FTS.
Lithium, tested in the same program: not detected.
What the EPA limits mean here
In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.
Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.
What you can do at home
Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.
Other systems in Massachusetts
- Everett Water Dept. (mwra) none detected
- Beverly Water Dept 2 PFAS detected
- Plymouth Water Department 2 PFAS detected
- Methuen Water Dept 3 PFAS detected
- Attleboro Water Dept above an EPA limit
- Arlington Water Dept. (mwra) none detected
All 263 tested systems in Massachusetts
ZIP codes served
02632 02634 02648 02655
As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.
Cite this page
Well & Tap. "PFAS in Centerville Osterville Marstons Mills WD water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID MA4020002. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/massachusetts/centerville-osterville-marstons-mills-wd/
About this data
Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID MA4020002). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.