Skip to content
Well & TapHome Water Treatment Database

Is there PFAS in Hardin County Water District #2 water?

Some. At least one sample reached an EPA limit, but the average at every sampling point stayed below it.

Hardin County Water District #2 Serves 76,326 people · 12 PFOA samples from 3 sampling points · Nov 2024 to Aug 2025 One or more samples at an EPA limit
PFOA Perfluorooctanoic acid 1.6 ppt avg · max 6.2
EPA 4
PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid 1.3 ppt avg · max 5.3
EPA 4
PFNA Perfluorononanoic acid 1.2 ppt avg · max 4.7
EPA 10
Hazard index GenX, PFBS, PFNA, PFHxS combined 0.1 avg · max 0.5
EPA 1

Also detected, no federal limit: PFPeA, PFHxA, PFBA, PFBS.

Averages are for the worst sampling point, with non-detects counted as zero. Source: EPA UCMR 5.

Hardin County Water District #2 is a public water system drawing on surface water, based in Elizabethtown, Kentucky, serving about 76,326 people, including Lebanon Junction, Elizabethtown, White Mills. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 12 times across 3 sampling points between Nov 2024 and Aug 2025.

Every PFAS detected

PFAS Detected Highest Worst point avg EPA limit
PFPeA
Perfluoropentanoic acid
1 of 12 7.4 ppt 1.9 ppt none
PFOA
Perfluorooctanoic acid
2 of 12 6.2 ppt 1.6 ppt 4 ppt
PFHxA
Perfluorohexanoic acid
2 of 12 5.3 ppt 1.3 ppt none
PFOS
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid
1 of 12 5.3 ppt 1.3 ppt 4 ppt
PFBA
Perfluorobutanoic acid
1 of 12 5.2 ppt 1.3 ppt none
PFBS
Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid
2 of 12 5.2 ppt 1.3 ppt none
PFNA
Perfluorononanoic acid
1 of 12 4.7 ppt 1.2 ppt 10 ppt

Not detected: 8:2 FTS, 4:2 FTS, 6:2 FTS, HFPO-DA, ADONA, 9Cl-PF3ONS, PFDA, PFUnA, PFMPA, PFDoA, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, PFEESA, PFPeS, PFHpS, PFHpA, PFHxS, PFTA, PFTrDA, NEtFOSAA, PFMBA, NMeFOSAA, NFDHA.

Lithium, tested in the same program: not detected.

What the EPA limits mean here

In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.

Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.

What you can do at home

Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.

Other systems in Kentucky

All 231 tested systems in Kentucky

ZIP codes served

40150 42701 42788

As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.

Cite this page

Well & Tap. "PFAS in Hardin County Water District #2 water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID KY0470175. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/kentucky/hardin-county-water-district-2/

About this data

Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID KY0470175). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.