Also detected, no federal limit: PFPeA, PFHxA, PFBS, PFPeS.
Is there PFAS in Frusi Water Treatment Plant water?
Yes. EPA's final UCMR 5 results show Frusi Water Treatment Plant averaged 14.1 ppt of PFOA at its worst sampling point, 3.5 times the EPA limit of 4 ppt.
Frusi Water Treatment Plant is a public water system drawing on groundwater, based in Fort Riley, Kansas, serving about 35,784 people. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 2 times across 1 sampling point between Sep 2023 and Mar 2024.
Every PFAS detected
| PFAS | Detected | Highest | Worst point avg | EPA limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFOA Perfluorooctanoic acid |
2 of 2 | 21.1 ppt | 14.1 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFHxS Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid |
2 of 2 | 20.1 ppt | 18.8 ppt | 10 ppt |
| PFPeA Perfluoropentanoic acid |
2 of 2 | 16.5 ppt | 11.3 ppt | none |
| PFHxA Perfluorohexanoic acid |
2 of 2 | 9.2 ppt | 7.2 ppt | none |
| PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid |
1 of 2 | 8.8 ppt | 4.4 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFBS Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid |
2 of 2 | 6.9 ppt | 6.4 ppt | none |
| PFPeS Perfluoropentanesulfonic acid |
2 of 2 | 4.4 ppt | 4.3 ppt | none |
Not detected: PFUnA, PFBA, HFPO-DA, ADONA, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, 6:2 FTS, 9Cl-PF3ONS, 4:2 FTS, 8:2 FTS, PFEESA, PFDoA, PFMPA, PFHpS, NFDHA, NEtFOSAA, PFDA, PFMBA, PFTrDA, NMeFOSAA, PFHpA, PFNA, PFTA.
Lithium, tested in the same program: highest 30.9 ppb, detected in 2 of 2 samples. EPA's health-based screening level is 10 ppb.
What the EPA limits mean here
In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.
Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.
What you can do at home
Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.
Other systems in Kansas
- City of Garden City none detected
- University of Kansas 1 PFAS detected
- Leavenworth Water Department none detected
- City of Hutchinson none detected
- City of Dodge City above an EPA limit
- El Paso Water Company none detected
All 103 tested systems in Kansas
ZIP codes served
66442
As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.
Cite this page
Well & Tap. "PFAS in Frusi Water Treatment Plant water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID KS2006114. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/kansas/frusi-water-treatment-plant/
About this data
Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID KS2006114). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.