Also detected, no federal limit: PFPeA, PFHxA, PFBA, PFPeS, PFHpA, PFBS, 6:2 FTS.
Is there PFAS in City of Great Bend water?
Yes. EPA's final UCMR 5 results show City of Great Bend averaged 44.0 ppt of PFHxS at its worst sampling point, 4.4 times the EPA limit of 10 ppt.
City of Great Bend is a public water system drawing on groundwater, based in Great Bend, Kansas, serving about 14,580 people. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 20 times across 10 sampling points between Oct 2023 and May 2024.
Every PFAS detected
| PFAS | Detected | Highest | Worst point avg | EPA limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFPeA Perfluoropentanoic acid |
4 of 20 | 110 ppt | 74.5 ppt | none |
| PFHxA Perfluorohexanoic acid |
4 of 20 | 69.0 ppt | 47.0 ppt | none |
| PFHxS Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid |
10 of 20 | 60.0 ppt | 44.0 ppt | 10 ppt |
| PFBA Perfluorobutanoic acid |
4 of 20 | 25.0 ppt | 17.4 ppt | none |
| PFPeS Perfluoropentanesulfonic acid |
4 of 20 | 18.0 ppt | 12.4 ppt | none |
| PFHpA Perfluoroheptanoic acid |
4 of 20 | 13.0 ppt | 9.0 ppt | none |
| PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid |
4 of 20 | 11.0 ppt | 8.0 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFBS Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid |
6 of 20 | 11.0 ppt | 8.2 ppt | none |
| 6:2 FTS 6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonic acid |
3 of 20 | 10.0 ppt | 7.6 ppt | none |
| PFOA Perfluorooctanoic acid |
1 of 20 | 5.2 ppt | 2.6 ppt | 4 ppt |
Not detected: NFDHA, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, 9Cl-PF3ONS, ADONA, HFPO-DA, PFUnA, PFEESA, PFMBA, PFMPA, 8:2 FTS, PFTrDA, PFHpS, 4:2 FTS, PFTA, PFDA, NEtFOSAA, PFNA, PFDoA, NMeFOSAA.
Lithium, tested in the same program: highest 41.5 ppb, detected in 20 of 20 samples. EPA's health-based screening level is 10 ppb.
What the EPA limits mean here
In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.
Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.
What you can do at home
Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.
Other systems in Kansas
- City of Mcpherson none detected
- American Water - Fort Leavenworth none detected
- City of El Dorado none detected
- City of Ottawa 1 PFAS detected
- Shawnee CO Rwd 4c 1 PFAS detected
- City of Arkansas City 2 PFAS detected
All 103 tested systems in Kansas
ZIP codes served
67530
As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.
Cite this page
Well & Tap. "PFAS in City of Great Bend water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID KS2000911. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/kansas/city-of-great-bend/
About this data
Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID KS2000911). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.