Also detected, no federal limit: PFBA.
Is there PFAS in Iowa-american Wtr Co-davenport water?
Some. At least one sample reached an EPA limit, but the average at every sampling point stayed below it.
Iowa-american Wtr Co-davenport is a public water system drawing on surface water, based in Davenport, Iowa, serving about 147,720 people, including Royal, Bettendorf, Blue Grass, Clinton, Le Claire, Davenport. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 3 times across 1 sampling point between Feb 2023 and Nov 2023.
Every PFAS detected
| PFAS | Detected | Highest | Worst point avg | EPA limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFBA Perfluorobutanoic acid |
3 of 3 | 14.8 ppt | 13.5 ppt | none |
| PFOA Perfluorooctanoic acid |
1 of 3 | 4.1 ppt | 1.4 ppt | 4 ppt |
Not detected: PFDoA, PFTA, PFHpA, PFOS, PFNA, PFHxS, PFBS, PFDA, NMeFOSAA, PFTrDA, PFHxA, PFMBA, NEtFOSAA, 4:2 FTS, PFHpS, PFPeS, NFDHA, PFEESA, PFMPA, 8:2 FTS, PFUnA, 6:2 FTS, HFPO-DA, ADONA, 9Cl-PF3ONS, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, PFPeA.
Lithium, tested in the same program: not detected.
What the EPA limits mean here
In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.
Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.
What you can do at home
Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.
Other systems in Iowa
- Cedar Rapids Water Department none detected
- Sioux City Water Supply above an EPA limit
- City of Ankeny none detected
- West Des Moines Water Works none detected
- Waterloo Water Works above an EPA limit
- Iowa City Water Department none detected
All 152 tested systems in Iowa
ZIP codes served
51357 52722 52726 52732 52753 52801 52802 52803 52804 52805 52806 52807
As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.
Cite this page
Well & Tap. "PFAS in Iowa-american Wtr Co-davenport water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID IA8222001. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/iowa/iowa-american-wtr-co-davenport/
About this data
Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID IA8222001). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.