Skip to content
Well & TapHome Water Treatment Database

Is there PFAS in Manchester Water Department water?

Yes. EPA's final UCMR 5 results show Manchester Water Department averaged 16.0 ppt of PFOS at its worst sampling point, 4.0 times the EPA limit of 4 ppt.

Manchester Water Department Serves 51,198 people · 24 PFOA samples from 3 sampling points · Oct 2023 to Jul 2024 Average above an EPA limit
PFOA Perfluorooctanoic acid 12.5 ppt avg · max 13.0
EPA 4
PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid 16.0 ppt avg
EPA 4
PFHxS Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid 3.5 ppt avg · max 3.8
EPA 10
Hazard index GenX, PFBS, PFNA, PFHxS combined 0.3 avg · max 0.4
EPA 1

Also detected, no federal limit: PFBS, PFHxA, PFPeA, PFHpA.

Averages are for the worst sampling point, with non-detects counted as zero. Source: EPA UCMR 5.

Manchester Water Department is a public water system drawing on surface water, based in Manchester, Connecticut, serving about 51,198 people, including Glastonbury, Manchester, Vernon Rockville, South Windsor. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 24 times across 3 sampling points between Oct 2023 and Jul 2024.

Every PFAS detected

PFAS Detected Highest Worst point avg EPA limit
PFOS
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid
6 of 24 16.0 ppt 16.0 ppt 4 ppt
PFBS
Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid
5 of 24 15.0 ppt 14.0 ppt none
PFOA
Perfluorooctanoic acid
14 of 24 13.0 ppt 12.5 ppt 4 ppt
PFHxA
Perfluorohexanoic acid
8 of 24 4.7 ppt 4.5 ppt none
PFPeA
Perfluoropentanoic acid
5 of 24 4.7 ppt 4.7 ppt none
PFHxS
Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid
4 of 24 3.8 ppt 3.5 ppt 10 ppt
PFHpA
Perfluoroheptanoic acid
2 of 24 3.5 ppt 3.3 ppt none

Not detected: PFNA, PFDA, PFDoA, PFUnA, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, 9Cl-PF3ONS, ADONA, HFPO-DA, PFBA, PFHpS, NEtFOSAA, 6:2 FTS, PFTA, NMeFOSAA, PFPeS, NFDHA, PFEESA, PFMBA, PFMPA, 8:2 FTS, 4:2 FTS, PFTrDA.

Lithium, tested in the same program: not detected.

What the EPA limits mean here

In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.

Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.

What you can do at home

Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.

Other systems in Connecticut

All 63 tested systems in Connecticut

ZIP codes served

06033 06040 06042 06066 06074

As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.

Cite this page

Well & Tap. "PFAS in Manchester Water Department water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID CT0770021. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/connecticut/manchester-water-department/

About this data

Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID CT0770021). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.