Also detected, no federal limit: PFBS, PFHxA, PFPeA, PFHpA.
Is there PFAS in Manchester Water Department water?
Yes. EPA's final UCMR 5 results show Manchester Water Department averaged 16.0 ppt of PFOS at its worst sampling point, 4.0 times the EPA limit of 4 ppt.
Manchester Water Department is a public water system drawing on surface water, based in Manchester, Connecticut, serving about 51,198 people, including Glastonbury, Manchester, Vernon Rockville, South Windsor. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 24 times across 3 sampling points between Oct 2023 and Jul 2024.
Every PFAS detected
| PFAS | Detected | Highest | Worst point avg | EPA limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid |
6 of 24 | 16.0 ppt | 16.0 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFBS Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid |
5 of 24 | 15.0 ppt | 14.0 ppt | none |
| PFOA Perfluorooctanoic acid |
14 of 24 | 13.0 ppt | 12.5 ppt | 4 ppt |
| PFHxA Perfluorohexanoic acid |
8 of 24 | 4.7 ppt | 4.5 ppt | none |
| PFPeA Perfluoropentanoic acid |
5 of 24 | 4.7 ppt | 4.7 ppt | none |
| PFHxS Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid |
4 of 24 | 3.8 ppt | 3.5 ppt | 10 ppt |
| PFHpA Perfluoroheptanoic acid |
2 of 24 | 3.5 ppt | 3.3 ppt | none |
Not detected: PFNA, PFDA, PFDoA, PFUnA, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, 9Cl-PF3ONS, ADONA, HFPO-DA, PFBA, PFHpS, NEtFOSAA, 6:2 FTS, PFTA, NMeFOSAA, PFPeS, NFDHA, PFEESA, PFMBA, PFMPA, 8:2 FTS, 4:2 FTS, PFTrDA.
Lithium, tested in the same program: not detected.
What the EPA limits mean here
In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.
Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.
What you can do at home
Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.
Other systems in Connecticut
- Bristol Water Department 2 PFAS detected
- Aquarion Water CO of Ct-greenwich System above an EPA limit
- Meriden Water Division 7 PFAS detected
- Southington Water Department above an EPA limit
- South Norwalk Electric & Water none detected
- Middletown Water Department none detected
All 63 tested systems in Connecticut
ZIP codes served
06033 06040 06042 06066 06074
As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.
Cite this page
Well & Tap. "PFAS in Manchester Water Department water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID CT0770021. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/connecticut/manchester-water-department/
About this data
Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID CT0770021). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.