Skip to content
Well & TapHome Water Treatment Database

Is there PFAS in Widefield WSD water?

Yes. EPA's final UCMR 5 results show Widefield WSD averaged 11.9 ppt of PFOS at its worst sampling point, 3.0 times the EPA limit of 4 ppt.

Widefield WSD Serves 27,640 people · 24 PFOA samples from 9 sampling points · May 2023 to Feb 2024 Average above an EPA limit
PFOA Perfluorooctanoic acid 10.2 ppt avg · max 10.5
EPA 4
PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid 11.9 ppt avg · max 15.8
EPA 4
PFHxS Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid 27.8 ppt avg · max 28.4
EPA 10
Hazard index GenX, PFBS, PFNA, PFHxS combined 2.8 avg · max 2.9
EPA 1

Also detected, no federal limit: PFHxA, PFPeA, PFBA, PFBS, PFPeS.

Averages are for the worst sampling point, with non-detects counted as zero. Source: EPA UCMR 5.

Widefield WSD is a public water system drawing on surface water, based in Colorado Springs, Colorado, serving about 27,640 people, including Fountain, Colorado Springs. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 24 times across 9 sampling points between May 2023 and Feb 2024.

Every PFAS detected

PFAS Detected Highest Worst point avg EPA limit
PFHxA
Perfluorohexanoic acid
12 of 24 141 ppt 130 ppt none
PFPeA
Perfluoropentanoic acid
14 of 24 109 ppt 104 ppt none
PFBA
Perfluorobutanoic acid
13 of 24 42.0 ppt 39.8 ppt none
PFHxS
Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid
6 of 24 28.4 ppt 27.8 ppt 10 ppt
PFBS
Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid
6 of 24 16.7 ppt 15.9 ppt none
PFOS
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid
4 of 24 15.8 ppt 11.9 ppt 4 ppt
PFOA
Perfluorooctanoic acid
4 of 24 10.5 ppt 10.2 ppt 4 ppt
PFPeS
Perfluoropentanesulfonic acid
2 of 24 5.3 ppt 5.0 ppt none

Not detected: 4:2 FTS, ADONA, HFPO-DA, 9Cl-PF3ONS, 6:2 FTS, 8:2 FTS, PFMPA, PFMBA, PFEESA, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, PFHpS, NFDHA, NEtFOSAA, PFHpA, PFNA, PFTA, NMeFOSAA, PFUnA, PFTrDA, PFDA, PFDoA.

Lithium, tested in the same program: highest 78.6 ppb, detected in 22 of 24 samples. EPA's health-based screening level is 10 ppb.

What the EPA limits mean here

In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.

Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.

What you can do at home

Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.

Other systems in Colorado

All 165 tested systems in Colorado

ZIP codes served

80817 80911 80925

As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.

Cite this page

Well & Tap. "PFAS in Widefield WSD water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID CO0121900. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/colorado/widefield-wsd/

About this data

Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID CO0121900). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.