Also detected, no federal limit: PFPeA, PFHxA, PFBS.
Is there PFAS in Cherokee Md water?
Some. At least one sample reached an EPA limit, but the average at every sampling point stayed below it.
Cherokee Md is a public water system drawing on groundwater, based in Colorado Springs, Colorado, serving about 29,610 people. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 6 times across 3 sampling points between Apr 2024 and Oct 2024.
Every PFAS detected
| PFAS | Detected | Highest | Worst point avg | EPA limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFPeA Perfluoropentanoic acid |
3 of 6 | 19.8 ppt | 11.4 ppt | none |
| PFHxA Perfluorohexanoic acid |
2 of 6 | 17.6 ppt | 8.8 ppt | none |
| PFBS Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid |
2 of 6 | 7.6 ppt | 3.8 ppt | none |
| PFOA Perfluorooctanoic acid |
2 of 6 | 6.1 ppt | 3.1 ppt | 4 ppt |
Not detected: PFDA, PFOS, PFNA, PFHxS, PFEESA, PFMBA, PFHpA, NEtFOSAA, NMeFOSAA, PFTA, PFDoA, PFTrDA, NFDHA, 8:2 FTS, PFPeS, PFMPA, 4:2 FTS, PFBA, HFPO-DA, ADONA, 9Cl-PF3ONS, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, PFUnA, 6:2 FTS, PFHpS.
Lithium, tested in the same program: highest 25.7 ppb, detected in 6 of 6 samples. EPA's health-based screening level is 10 ppb.
What the EPA limits mean here
In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.
Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.
What you can do at home
Two routes work for PFAS. For drinking and cooking water only, a reverse osmosis system certified to NSF/ANSI 58 with a PFOA/PFOS reduction claim is the cheapest proven option. To treat every tap and shower, a whole-house carbon system with enough contact time works, but check that the maker has PFAS test data, not just a marketing claim. See the best filters for PFAS and how PFAS removal works.
Other systems in Colorado
- Pueblo West Md none detected
- City of Lafayette none detected
- Town of Breckenridge none detected
- Arapahoe Cnty Wwwa 5 PFAS detected
- City of Aspen none detected
- East Larimer County WD none detected
All 165 tested systems in Colorado
ZIP codes served
80915 80922 80928 80939 80951
As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.
Cite this page
Well & Tap. "PFAS in Cherokee Md water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID CO0121125. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/colorado/cherokee-md/
About this data
Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID CO0121125). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.