Also detected, no federal limit: PFBA.
Is there PFAS in City of Banning water?
Yes, at low levels. 1 PFAS was detected, all below EPA's 2024 limits.
City of Banning is a public water system drawing on groundwater, based in Banning, California, serving about 31,680 people. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 24 times across 12 sampling points between Sep 2023 and Mar 2024.
Every PFAS detected
| PFAS | Detected | Highest | Worst point avg | EPA limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFBA Perfluorobutanoic acid |
1 of 24 | 8.0 ppt | 4.0 ppt | none |
Not detected: PFDoA, 6:2 FTS, HFPO-DA, ADONA, 9Cl-PF3ONS, PFOS, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, PFDA, PFHxA, 4:2 FTS, PFTrDA, PFUnA, 8:2 FTS, PFMPA, PFPeA, PFMBA, PFEESA, NFDHA, PFPeS, PFTA, NEtFOSAA, NMeFOSAA, PFNA, PFHxS, PFHpS, PFHpA, PFBS, PFOA.
Lithium, tested in the same program: highest 16 ppb, detected in 1 of 24 samples. EPA's health-based screening level is 10 ppb.
What the EPA limits mean here
In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.
Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.
What you can do at home
Levels here are under EPA's limits, so no treatment is required. If you want them lower anyway, a certified reverse osmosis system under the sink handles drinking water, and a whole-house carbon filter also takes out the chlorine or chloramine your utility adds.
Other systems in California
- City of Burlingame none detected
- La Verne, City WD none detected
- Paso Robles Water Department above an EPA limit
- Santa Paula Water System none detected
- Los Angeles Cwwd 29 & 80-malibu none detected
- City of Martinez none detected
All 707 tested systems in California
ZIP codes served
92220
As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.
Cite this page
Well & Tap. "PFAS in City of Banning water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID CA3310006. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/california/city-of-banning/
About this data
Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID CA3310006). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.