Is there PFAS in James Fork Regional Water District water?
No PFAS were detected in any of the 4 samples EPA's program collected.
James Fork Regional Water District is a public water system drawing on surface water, based in Greenwood, Arkansas, serving about 11,538 people, including Fort Smith, Boles, Booneville, Greenwood, Hackett, Hartford. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 4 times across 1 sampling point between May 2024 and Feb 2025.
Every PFAS detected
None of the 29 PFAS were found at or above EPA's minimum reporting levels (2 to 20 ppt depending on the compound).
Not detected: 8:2 FTS, 6:2 FTS, PFBA, HFPO-DA, ADONA, PFPeA, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, PFMPA, PFUnA, PFHxA, PFDoA, PFDA, PFTrDA, PFOA, 9Cl-PF3ONS, NEtFOSAA, PFBS, PFHxS, PFNA, PFOS, 4:2 FTS, PFHpA, PFMBA, NMeFOSAA, PFHpS, PFPeS, NFDHA, PFEESA, PFTA.
Lithium, tested in the same program: not detected.
What the EPA limits mean here
In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.
Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.
What you can do at home
No PFAS action is needed on these results. If your water tastes or smells of chlorine, a whole-house city water filter is the usual fix.
Other systems in Arkansas
- Hope Water Light Comm none detected
- Madison CO Water Facilities Bd none detected
- Magnolia Waterworks none detected
- Arkadelphia Waterworks none detected
- Mid-arkansas Utilities P.w.a none detected
- Sw White County Water Assn none detected
All 172 tested systems in Arkansas
ZIP codes served
72916 72926 72927 72936 72937 72938 72940 72944 72945 72950 72958
As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.
Cite this page
Well & Tap. "PFAS in James Fork Regional Water District water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID AR0000513. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/arkansas/james-fork-regional-water-district/
About this data
Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID AR0000513). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.