Skip to content
Well & TapHome Water Treatment Database

Is there PFAS in Richfield water?

Yes, at low levels. 1 PFAS was detected, all below EPA's 2024 limits.

Richfield Serves 36,899 people · 2 PFOA samples from 1 sampling point · Oct 2024 to Feb 2025 PFAS found, below EPA limits
PFOA Perfluorooctanoic acid not detected
EPA 4
PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid not detected
EPA 4

Also detected, no federal limit: PFBA.

Averages are for the worst sampling point, with non-detects counted as zero. Source: EPA UCMR 5.

Richfield is a public water system drawing on groundwater, based in Richfield, Minnesota, serving about 36,899 people. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 2 times across 1 sampling point between Oct 2024 and Feb 2025.

Every PFAS detected

PFAS Detected Highest Worst point avg EPA limit
PFBA
Perfluorobutanoic acid
2 of 2 20.0 ppt 18.1 ppt none

Not detected: HFPO-DA, ADONA, 9Cl-PF3ONS, NMeFOSAA, PFBS, PFHpA, PFHxS, PFNA, PFOS, PFOA, PFDA, PFDoA, PFHxA, PFTrDA, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, PFTA, 6:2 FTS, 4:2 FTS, 8:2 FTS, PFMPA, PFPeA, PFMBA, PFEESA, NFDHA, PFPeS, PFHpS, PFUnA, NEtFOSAA.

Lithium, tested in the same program: not detected.

What the EPA limits mean here

In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.

Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.

What you can do at home

Levels here are under EPA's limits, so no treatment is required. If you want them lower anyway, a certified reverse osmosis system under the sink handles drinking water, and a whole-house carbon filter also takes out the chlorine or chloramine your utility adds.

Other systems in Minnesota

All 196 tested systems in Minnesota

ZIP codes served

55423

As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.

Cite this page

Well & Tap. "PFAS in Richfield water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID MN1270045. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/minnesota/richfield/

About this data

Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID MN1270045). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.