Also detected, no federal limit: PFBA, PFPeA.
Is there PFAS in Big Lake water?
Yes, at low levels. 2 PFAS were detected, all below EPA's 2024 limits.
Big Lake is a public water system drawing on groundwater, based in Big Lake, Minnesota, serving about 13,056 people. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 4 times across 2 sampling points between Dec 2023 and Aug 2024.
Every PFAS detected
| PFAS | Detected | Highest | Worst point avg | EPA limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFBA Perfluorobutanoic acid |
4 of 4 | 15.5 ppt | 15.2 ppt | none |
| PFPeA Perfluoropentanoic acid |
1 of 4 | 3.3 ppt | 1.6 ppt | none |
Not detected: PFHxA, 6:2 FTS, HFPO-DA, PFOS, 9Cl-PF3ONS, PFDA, PFUnA, PFDoA, 4:2 FTS, PFOA, PFHpS, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, 8:2 FTS, PFMPA, PFMBA, PFEESA, PFPeS, PFTA, PFTrDA, NEtFOSAA, NMeFOSAA, ADONA, PFNA, NFDHA, PFHpA, PFHxS, PFBS.
Lithium, tested in the same program: not detected.
What the EPA limits mean here
In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.
Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.
What you can do at home
Levels here are under EPA's limits, so no treatment is required. If you want them lower anyway, a certified reverse osmosis system under the sink handles drinking water, and a whole-house carbon filter also takes out the chlorine or chloramine your utility adds.
Other systems in Minnesota
- Vadnais Heights 1 PFAS detected
- North Saint Paul 3 PFAS detected
- Cloquet above an EPA limit
- Mounds View none detected
- Waconia none detected
- Lincoln-Pipestone Rural Water System none detected
All 196 tested systems in Minnesota
ZIP codes served
55309
As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.
Cite this page
Well & Tap. "PFAS in Big Lake water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID MN1710002. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/minnesota/big-lake/
About this data
Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID MN1710002). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.