Skip to content
Well & TapHome Water Treatment Database

Is there PFAS in Iowa-american Wtr Co-clinton District water?

Yes, at low levels. 5 PFAS were detected, all below EPA's 2024 limits.

Iowa-american Wtr Co-clinton District Serves 24,769 people · 8 PFOA samples from 4 sampling points · Apr 2023 to Oct 2023 PFAS found, below EPA limits
PFOA Perfluorooctanoic acid not detected
EPA 4
PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid not detected
EPA 4
Hazard index GenX, PFBS, PFNA, PFHxS combined 0.0 avg
EPA 1

Also detected, no federal limit: PFBA, PFPeA, PFBS, PFMPA, PFMBA.

Averages are for the worst sampling point, with non-detects counted as zero. Source: EPA UCMR 5.

Iowa-american Wtr Co-clinton District is a public water system drawing on groundwater, based in Clinton, Iowa, serving about 24,769 people. Under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule it was tested for 29 PFAS and lithium 8 times across 4 sampling points between Apr 2023 and Oct 2023.

Every PFAS detected

PFAS Detected Highest Worst point avg EPA limit
PFBA
Perfluorobutanoic acid
2 of 8 648 ppt 647 ppt none
PFPeA
Perfluoropentanoic acid
2 of 8 18.1 ppt 17.6 ppt none
PFBS
Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid
2 of 8 11.7 ppt 11.1 ppt none
PFMPA
PFMPA
2 of 8 10.4 ppt 9.8 ppt none
PFMBA
PFMBA
2 of 8 3.0 ppt 3.0 ppt none

Not detected: PFOS, ADONA, 9Cl-PF3ONS, 11Cl-PF3OUdS, PFUnA, PFHxA, PFDoA, PFOA, 4:2 FTS, PFNA, PFHxS, PFHpA, PFDA, NMeFOSAA, HFPO-DA, 6:2 FTS, NEtFOSAA, PFTrDA, PFTA, PFHpS, NFDHA, PFEESA, PFPeS, 8:2 FTS.

Lithium, tested in the same program: highest 67.4 ppb, detected in 6 of 8 samples. EPA's health-based screening level is 10 ppb.

What the EPA limits mean here

In April 2024 EPA set enforceable limits of 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA and GenX, and a hazard index of 1 for mixtures. Utilities were given until 2029 to comply. In May 2026 EPA proposed keeping only the PFOA and PFOS limits and moving that deadline to 2031. Until that proposal is final, the 2024 limits stand.

Compliance is judged on a running annual average at each entry point, so we show the average at this system's worst sampling point next to its single highest result. UCMR 5 results do not by themselves put a utility in or out of compliance.

What you can do at home

Levels here are under EPA's limits, so no treatment is required. If you want them lower anyway, a certified reverse osmosis system under the sink handles drinking water, and a whole-house carbon filter also takes out the chlorine or chloramine your utility adds.

Other systems in Iowa

All 152 tested systems in Iowa

ZIP codes served

52732 52736

As reported by the utility to EPA. Neighbouring ZIPs are often split between systems; your water bill names yours.

Cite this page

Well & Tap. "PFAS in Iowa-american Wtr Co-clinton District water: EPA UCMR 5 results." Data: U.S. EPA Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final release August 2026, PWSID IA2326048. https://wellandtap.com/pfas/iowa/iowa-american-wtr-co-clinton-district/

About this data

Source: U.S. EPA, UCMR 5 occurrence data, final release August 2026 (PWSID IA2326048). Population: EPA SDWIS. Averages count results below the reporting level as zero, the same convention EPA uses for running annual averages. Full method.